Why Housing Society Elections Turn Toxic

Not About Service, Not About Pay

Not About Service, Not About Pay

The Puzzle of Unpaid Yet Ferociously Contested Positions

In housing societies across Indian cities, elections to managing committees are officially described as routine democratic exercises meant to ensure smooth administration. The roles of President, Secretary, Treasurer, and committee members are clearly defined as honorary positions without any salary or financial remuneration. These roles demand time, patience, administrative effort, and legal accountability and often expose office bearers to criticism and personal conflict. Yet, paradoxically, such elections frequently become the most fiercely contested events within residential communities, marked by emotional campaigning, sharp divisions, and prolonged disputes.

When the struggle is intense but the pay is zero, the real prize must be unseen.

A Perspective Shaped by Multiple Cities

As I have lived in Delhi, Gurgaon, Mumbai and Chennai, the sensitivity and ferocity of contesting elections varies between cities. In some places, elections were competitive but civil. In others, they were largely procedural. These differences reflect not just governance structures, but local attitudes towards authority and control within shared residential spaces.

Urban culture shapes not only how people live, but how they compete.

A Distinct Experience in Chennai

My recent experience in Chennai, where I currently reside, has been markedly different. After witnessing two housing society elections here, the conduct of candidates stood out sharply. Contesting elections appeared less about administration or voluntary service and more about consolidating control. Group loyalties formed quickly, and the intent often seemed to be ensuring that one group dominated the other.

What stood out was not competition itself, but the absence of restraint.

Power as the Hidden Reward

Despite being unpaid, office bearer posts provide a form of power that directly shapes everyday life within a housing society. Maintenance contracts, security agencies, vendor approvals, rule enforcement, permissions, and dispute handling are all controlled by the committee. In such an environment, authority itself becomes the incentive.

Unpaid power often operates with fewer restraints than paid authority.

Housing Societies as Small Political Ecosystems

A housing society functions like a small political ecosystem. With bylaws acting as laws and committees as executive bodies, power often concentrates quickly. In the absence of strong participation, these institutions become highly vulnerable to capture.

Power feels strongest where there are no competing centres of authority.

The Rise of Groupism in Residential Communities

Groupism has become one of the most corrosive forces in housing societies. Communities fracture into factions based on loyalty, grievance or familiarity. Elections then become battles of dominance rather than choices about governance.

Once groups replace principles, elections become battles rather than choices.

Dominance Replacing Dialogue

When one group controls the managing committee, dialogue often disappears. Rules are enforced selectively, dissent is discouraged, and governance becomes partisan. Neutral administration gives way to factional dominance.

When one group controls power, the society ceases to be common ground.

The Cost to Ordinary Residents

The cost of such governance is borne by ordinary residents. Trust erodes, disputes multiply, and community harmony weakens. Many residents disengage, reducing the society to only a housing arrangement rather than a shared institution.

When governance fails, community spirit fades quietly.

Conclusion: A Choice Every Society Must Confront

Eagerness to contest unpaid posts is not inherently wrong. Leadership energy can benefit communities when guided by ethics and restraint. The danger arises when ambition combines with groupism and silence. Every housing society must decide whether it will remain a shared democratic space or become an arena for factional domination.

Societies do not decay from conflict, but from captured governance.
``

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Housing Societies' Challanges

  Challenges for Associations in Housing Societies (Governance Failures, Member Conduct, and the Need for Collective Responsibility) Managing a housing society association today goes far beyond routine administration. Associations are expected to function as administrators, enforcers, mediators, financial managers, and legal custodians-often with limited authority and entirely voluntary manpower. The real challenges, however, are not operational alone. They arise from human behaviour, selective morality, democratic apathy, groupism, misplaced priorities, and weak adherence to collective decisions . Together, these issues make governance fragile and exhausting. At the heart of most problems lies one core issue: absence of a shared code of conduct in practice , even when rules exist on paper. 1. Rules Without Discipline: Selective Obedience as a Norm Most housing societies have bylaws, policies, and resolutions approved by the General Body. Yet violations continue b...
Read more

Understanding the Hidden Causes Behind Community Disengagement

Why General Body Meetings See Poor Attendance Why General Body Meetings See Poor Attendance When Negativity, Grandiose Narratives, and Silence Undermine Collective Governance General Body Meetings (GBMs) are meant to be the highest and most consequential decision‑making forums in any housing society. They are where members collectively deliberate and decide on finances, audits, elections, by‑laws, statutory compliance, safety, and long‑term infrastructure planning. In theory, they represent democracy at the most immediate, neighbourhood level. Yet, despite their importance, poor attendance at General Body Meetings remains a persistent concern across housing societies. This challenge is neither isolated nor unique. Large gated communities and smaller associations alike struggle with similar patterns of disengagement, suggesting a systemic issue that goes beyond local personalities or circumstances. It i...
Read more

Growth Without Infrastructure

  Growth Without Infrastructure: Who Is Accountable for Urban Approval Failures? New residential apartments are coming up every other day across rapidly growing urban pockets. Construction activity is relentless, approvals are granted at speed, and urban skylines continue to change. Yet, beneath this visible growth lies a persistent and unresolved concern. Basic civic infrastructure has not kept pace with development. The approvals granted to these projects are not incidental. They pass through multiple layers of scrutiny involving planning authorities, local bodies, and utility departments. Building plans are sanctioned, statutory fees are collected, and compliance certificates are issued. However, once residents move in, the lived reality often exposes a serious gap between approvals on paper and preparedness on the ground.   Questions That Must Precede Approvals Before granting permission for large residential developments, certain fundamental questions demand c...
Read more